Bug#521711: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#521711: Bug#521711: Bug#521711: Looks fixed.

2009-06-08 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 package cdbs tags 521711 pending thanks Hi Peter, On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 12:39:52AM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >On Tuesday 09 June 2009 00:00:37 Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote: >> rm -r >> >> should be idempotent to: >> >> make -C clean >> rm

Bug#521711: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#521711: Bug#521711: Looks fixed.

2009-06-08 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 11:00:37PM +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote: >When I read your e-mail I decided to test your solution and I did: >modifying the real makefile.mk file. I did a copy of the original one, >but after some time, when I revisite

Bug#521711: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#521711: Bug#521711: Looks fixed.

2009-06-08 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Tuesday 09 June 2009 00:00:37 Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote: > rm -r > > should be idempotent to: > > make -C clean > rm -r > > It's only that formally, IMHO, the latter is more correct. FWIW, people have complained in similar situations that the latter is much slower. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Bug#521711: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#521711: Looks fixed.

2009-06-08 Thread Raúl Sánchez Siles
Hello all, Jonas: El Lunes 08 Junio 2009, Jonas Smedegaard escribió: > > Hi Raúl, > > On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 12:06:38AM +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote: > > The issue seems solved now. > > I am confused: What changed since you filed the bugreport? > > [..] > Therefore: Please elaborate on what

Bug#521711: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#521711: Looks fixed.

2009-06-07 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 package cdbs reopen 521711 thanks Hi Raúl, On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 12:06:38AM +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote: > The issue seems solved now. I am confused: What changed since you filed the bugreport? As I read your bugreport and my earlier

Bug#521711: Looks fixed.

2009-06-07 Thread Raúl Sánchez Siles
Version 0.4.56 Hello: Thanks Jonas for your fast reply. Unfortunately, for any reason it got lost and I hadn't it available on my inbox so I read it when I needed to check the bug again. The issue seems solved now. The current flow now is: test -x debian/rules rmdir obj-x86_64-linux-gnu