Bug#517008: alias not expanded with zsh -c

2016-03-10 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Control: found -1 5.2-3 On 2016-03-10 12:23:38 +0100, Christian Heinrich wrote: > I just verified that this patch was included in the latest ZSH package > in Stretch. Am I correct that this (pretty old) issue can actually be > closed as resolved? I can still reproduce it with zsh 5.2-3, which is

Bug#517008: alias not expanded with zsh -c

2016-03-10 Thread Christian Heinrich
Hi, I just verified that this patch was included in the latest ZSH package in Stretch. Am I correct that this (pretty old) issue can actually be closed as resolved? Best Christian On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:50:29 + Peter Stephenson wrote: > On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:14:31 -0700 > Bart Schaefer wr

Bug#517008: alias not expanded with zsh -c

2009-03-26 Thread Peter Stephenson
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:14:31 -0700 Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Mar 25, 6:20pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: > } > } But yes, I share your feeling that this isn't a particularly vital > } addition, it just looked easy to do like other shells in compatability > } mode, which is the point of that. > > It

Bug#517008: alias not expanded with zsh -c

2009-03-25 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Mar 25, 6:20pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: } } But yes, I share your feeling that this isn't a particularly vital } addition, it just looked easy to do like other shells in compatability } mode, which is the point of that. It just seems to me that we're potentially penalizing a script that does n

Bug#517008: alias not expanded with zsh -c

2009-03-25 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2009-03-25 11:11:28 -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Mar 25, 5:25pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: > } Subject: Re: Bug#517008: alias not expanded with zsh -c > } > } > Yes, at least as far as native zsh mode goes this isn't a bug. > } > } I should also have pointe

Bug#517008: alias not expanded with zsh -c

2009-03-25 Thread Peter Stephenson
Bart Schaefer wrote: > } Is the fix as simple as the following? This is not a trick question, I > } could very easily have missed something. > > Will this cover "emulate -c"? If you mean cover it in the sense that the option is turned on before any code is parsed---yes, but that's not changed by

Bug#517008: alias not expanded with zsh -c

2009-03-25 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Mar 25, 5:25pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: } Subject: Re: Bug#517008: alias not expanded with zsh -c } } > Yes, at least as far as native zsh mode goes this isn't a bug. } } I should also have pointed out that the "emulate sh" doesn't make any } difference, it only takes

Bug#517008: alias not expanded with zsh -c

2009-03-25 Thread Peter Stephenson
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:30:08 + Peter Stephenson wrote: >Clint Adams wrote: >>On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 03:28:50AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >>> Aliases are not expanded with the -c option, as shown below. >>> >>> vin% cmd=$(printf "emulate sh\nalias a='echo OK >&2'\na") >>> vin% printf "%s\n

Bug#517008: alias not expanded with zsh -c

2009-03-25 Thread Peter Stephenson
Clint Adams wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 03:28:50AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > Aliases are not expanded with the -c option, as shown below. > > > > vin% cmd=$(printf "emulate sh\nalias a='echo OK >&2'\na") > > vin% printf "%s\n" "$cmd" > > emulate sh > > alias a='echo OK >&2' > > a > >

Bug#517008: alias not expanded with zsh -c

2009-03-25 Thread Clint Adams
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 03:28:50AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Aliases are not expanded with the -c option, as shown below. > > vin% cmd=$(printf "emulate sh\nalias a='echo OK >&2'\na") > vin% printf "%s\n" "$cmd" > emulate sh > alias a='echo OK >&2' > a > vin% printf "%s" "$cmd" | zsh -f > OK

Bug#517008: alias not expanded with zsh -c

2009-02-24 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Package: zsh Version: 4.3.9-1 Severity: normal Aliases are not expanded with the -c option, as shown below. vin% cmd=$(printf "emulate sh\nalias a='echo OK >&2'\na") vin% printf "%s\n" "$cmd" emulate sh alias a='echo OK >&2' a vin% printf "%s" "$cmd" | zsh -f OK vin% zsh -fc "$cmd" zsh:3: command