On Mar 25, 6:20pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: } } But yes, I share your feeling that this isn't a particularly vital } addition, it just looked easy to do like other shells in compatability } mode, which is the point of that.
It just seems to me that we're potentially penalizing a script that does not use aliases in the can't-open-tempfile case in order to support a script that does not use aliases. Given potential security problems with using tempfiles and the likelyhood of a script using an alias vs. the likelyhood of file creation failing, which case ought we be catering too? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
