Kurt Roeckx writes:
> I assume you did something like "aptitude install libtool/experimental",
> and expected libtool-doc to also be upgraded?
aptitude install -t experimental libtool
which I think is the same thing.
> libtool-doc is only a Suggests. Maybe a Recommends would have
> different
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 06:18:38PM +, Philip Martin wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes:
>
> > I'm guessing you're saying that libtool-doc should still conflict
> > with libtool1.4-doc? I don't agree. libtool1.4-doc is only
> > part of oldstable. You should not be using it anymore in stable.
>
>
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> I'm guessing you're saying that libtool-doc should still conflict
> with libtool1.4-doc? I don't agree. libtool1.4-doc is only
> part of oldstable. You should not be using it anymore in stable.
No. I had libtool and libtool-doc 1.5 installed when I upgraded
libtool to 2
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:06:56PM +, Philip Martin wrote:
> Package: libtool
> Version: 2.2.6a-1
> Severity: normal
>
> The 1.5 series libtool packages conflict with the 1.4 series doc
> packages. The 2.2 libtool (in experimental) should conflict with both
> the 1.4 and 1.5 series doc pack
Package: libtool
Version: 2.2.6a-1
Severity: normal
The 1.5 series libtool packages conflict with the 1.4 series doc
packages. The 2.2 libtool (in experimental) should conflict with both
the 1.4 and 1.5 series doc packages but only the 1.4 conflict is
present. This means that an upgrade from
5 matches
Mail list logo
