On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 08:19:25PM +0100, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> I had a read through the issue and to me it sounds like pristine-tar is
> broken
> or at least expects the perl-module to work, where it IMHO should have never
> worked. I am wondering how many packages are affecting by this or a
Steffen Joeris wrote:
> I had a read through the issue and to me it sounds like pristine-tar is
> broken
> or at least expects the perl-module to work, where it IMHO should have never
> worked. I am wondering how many packages are affecting by this or assuming
> this behaviour.
Well, I can't s
Hi Niko
Sorry for the delay.
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 11:12:08 pm Niko Tyni wrote:
> fixed 479317 perl/5.8.8-7
> found 479317 perl/5.8.8-7etch5
> found 479317 perl/5.10.0-1
> thanks
>
> Hi security team,
>
> I'm sorry to report that we have a regression with perl/5.8.8-7etch5.
>
> As reported in #47931
fixed 479317 perl/5.8.8-7
found 479317 perl/5.8.8-7etch5
found 479317 perl/5.10.0-1
thanks
Hi security team,
I'm sorry to report that we have a regression with perl/5.8.8-7etch5.
As reported in #479317 originally for the 5.10 branch, removing the
current working directory with File::Path::rmtree
4 matches
Mail list logo
