[Petter Reinholdtsen]
> Here is a new patch, with code in the preinst to remove the obsolete
> init.d scripts. I am unable to NMU because I lack a operational arm
> machine to build it on.
Anyone willing to NMU or upload a fixed package?
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRI
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
> Yes, the old script should be removed and update-rc.d should be
> called to drop the init.d scripts from the boot script. Sorry for
> forgetting this in my initial patch. Can the package maintainers
> take care of this themselves, or do you need a new patch?
Here is a new
[Gordon Farquharson]
> With your patch on fresh lenny install, and I see the following
> messages on boot:
>
> /etc/rcS.d/S99zleds-stop-lvlS: line 15: /etc/init.d/leds: No such file
> or directory
>
> and
>
> /etc/rc2.d/S99zleds-stop-lvl2: line 15: /etc/init.d/leds: No such file
> or directory
>
Hi Petter
Sorry that I was not able to test your patch before your debconf9 presentation.
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 02:06, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I had a look at the handling of the leds-blinking init.d scripts after
> discussing this with Joey Hess at debconf, and here is a proposal
> rewri
tags 507545 + patch
thanks
I had a look at the handling of the leds-blinking init.d scripts after
discussing this with Joey Hess at debconf, and here is a proposal
rewriting the build system to use update-rc.d in a more traditional
way.
It installs two unique init.d scripts in each runlevel, one
Hi Petter
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 11:23, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Btw, why run a script both at the end of rcS.d and at the start of
> rc[0-6].d? It seem redundant to me. Why not only run one at the end
> of rcS.d (which is imedately before the start of rc[0-6].d), and then
> again at the e
Hi Petter
Sorry to keep harping on this issue, but I just don't see why the init
scripts provided by nslu2-utils violate the assumptions made in
/etc/init.d/rc.
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 03:59, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Note I am one of the maintainers of sysv-rc too, and it is not ment to
> su
[Gordon Farquharson]
>> Why not only run one at the end
>> of rcS.d (which is imedately before the start of rc[0-6].d), and then
>> again at the end of rc[0-6].d?
>
> This is a key point: what do I set in the LSB header to ensure that
> the script is run at the _end_ of each of these runlevels?
A
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 11:23, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Gordon Farquharson]
> I am not talking about insserv optimization. I am talking about
> sysv-rc (/etc/init.d/rc) optimizations, ie the normal debian boot
> system.
Ok, I misunderstood before.
> Neither the normal sysv-rc boot system n
[Gordon Farquharson]
> But if one does not use the optimization (I presume in this case,
> we're talking about insserv), then we don't have a problem.
I am not talking about insserv optimization. I am talking about
sysv-rc (/etc/init.d/rc) optimizations, ie the normal debian boot
system.
> It se
Hi Petter
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 03:59, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Well, it has been an underlying assumtion on the implementation of
> /etc/init.d/rc and its optimization. The fact that zleds is executed
> at all is pure luck. If the optimization had been implemented
> slightly differently,
[Gordon Farquharson]
> Hi Petter
>
> So after a lot of reading on init scripts and insserv, it seems to me
> that the init scripts provided by nslu2-utils are not supportable by
> insserv. You had written the following in a previous email thread:
Note I am one of the maintainers of sysv-rc too, a
Hi Petter
So after a lot of reading on init scripts and insserv, it seems to me
that the init scripts provided by nslu2-utils are not supportable by
insserv. You had written the following in a previous email thread:
---
[Gordon Farquharson]
> I took the runlevel information from the nslu2-utils d
Petter, do you have any comments regarding Gordon's mail?
* Gordon Farquharson [2008-12-14 21:33]:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 23:04, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> > Here are patches to add LSB headers to two of the four init.d scripts
> > in the nslu2-utils package. I am not sure I understood t
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 23:04, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Here are patches to add LSB headers to two of the four init.d scripts
> in the nslu2-utils package. I am not sure I understood the
> dependencies, so please review.
Thanks very much for script patches. I've tested them out on the NSLU2
Here are patches to add LSB headers to two of the four init.d scripts
in the nslu2-utils package. I am not sure I understood the
dependencies, so please review.
The last two scripts leds_startup and zleds, have such strange setup,
I was unable to come up with a proposal on how to get it working w
16 matches
Mail list logo