Bug#506223: I can confirm that

On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 20:11 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 07:10:47PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 18:36 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > > Indeed, loading aes_generic before running wpa_supplicant made it work > > > just fine! Does it make sense to

Bug#506223: I can confirm that

On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 07:10:47PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 18:36 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > Indeed, loading aes_generic before running wpa_supplicant made it work > > just fine! Does it make sense to file a bug against wpasupplicant > > asking for this to be turne

Bug#506223: I can confirm that

On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 18:36 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 03:50:53PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > This indicates that the mac80211 code was unable to set up the AES > > encryption/decryption state for WPA. Excluding the unlikely case that > > the system is really o

Bug#506223: I can confirm that

On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 03:50:53PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > This indicates that the mac80211 code was unable to set up the AES > encryption/decryption state for WPA. Excluding the unlikely case that > the system is really out of memory, this means that the 'aes' module is > not available.

Bug#506223: I can confirm that

On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 17:13 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 05:03:53PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:08 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 03:50:53PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 14:44 +0100, Marc

Bug#506223: I can confirm that

On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 05:03:53PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:08 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 03:50:53PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 14:44 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > > > WPA: Sending EAPOL-Key 4/4 > > > > WPA:

Bug#506223: I can confirm that

On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:08 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 03:50:53PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 14:44 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > > WPA: Sending EAPOL-Key 4/4 > > > WPA: TX EAPOL-Key - hexdump(len=99): 01 03 00 5f 02 03 0a 00 00 00 00 00 > >

Bug#506223: I can confirm that

On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 03:50:53PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 14:44 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > WPA: Sending EAPOL-Key 4/4 > > WPA: TX EAPOL-Key - hexdump(len=99): 01 03 00 5f 02 03 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0

Bug#506223: I can confirm that

On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 14:44 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 06:50:13PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:10:47PM +, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > > I just wiped my etch installation and replaced it with a fresh lenny > > > installation. The insta

Bug#506223: I can confirm that

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 06:50:13PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:10:47PM +, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > When I manually set it to "rate 11M", the reported bit rate goes to 11M, > > the real download speed improves by about 50% and the "link quality" > > goes to abo

Bug#506223: I can confirm that

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:10:47PM +, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > I just wiped my etch installation and replaced it with a fresh lenny > installation. The installer auto-detected my wifi card and used the > rt2500pci driver. > > By default it achieves: > - 1Mbps rate (as reported by iwconfig - I

Bug#506223: I can confirm that

I just wiped my etch installation and replaced it with a fresh lenny installation. The installer auto-detected my wifi card and used the rt2500pci driver. By default it achieves: - 1Mbps rate (as reported by iwconfig - I can only download at max. ~20KBps) - approx "50% link quality" When I m