On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 08:16:34AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Yes. However, it kind of breaks your logic (or I'm not getting it right),
> since it's the same -R that changes the distribution to unstable. Also,
> snapshot releases add a warning message, thus makiing the UNRELEASED
> redundant
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:27:38AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> El 12/11/08 05:12 Guido Günther escribió:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:35:04AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > > When using git-dch, there is always an UNRELEASED "change" line. I think
> > > it is not useful, so the following pat
El 12/11/08 05:12 Guido Günther escribió:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:35:04AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > When using git-dch, there is always an UNRELEASED "change" line. I think
> > it is not useful, so the following patch omits it.
>
> Thanks for the patch but having the UNRELEASED line is
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:35:04AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> When using git-dch, there is always an UNRELEASED "change" line. I think
> it is not useful, so the following patch omits it.
Thanks for the patch but having the UNRELEASED line is intended
behaviour.
> Known issue: if the person u
Package: git-buildpackage
Version: 0.4.41
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
When using git-dch, there is always an UNRELEASED "change" line. I think
it is not useful, so the following patch omits it.
Known issue: if the person using git-dch hasn't commited any changes,
then there will be an empty lin
5 matches
Mail list logo
