On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 08:16:34AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Yes. However, it kind of breaks your logic (or I'm not getting it right), > since it's the same -R that changes the distribution to unstable. Also, > snapshot releases add a warning message, thus makiing the UNRELEASED > redundant. These are just different usage cases, some people just run:
git-dch While others tend to do: git-dch -S -a # even several times followed by: git-dch -R -a Having a UNRELEASED line only makes kind of sense in the first case. But the longer I think about it, let's just drop it there either and apply your patch as is. We can modify/revert later, should there be complaints. Thanks, -- Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]