On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 08:16:34AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Yes. However, it kind of breaks your logic (or I'm not getting it right), 
> since it's the same -R that changes the distribution to unstable. Also, 
> snapshot releases add a warning message, thus makiing the UNRELEASED 
> redundant.
These are just different usage cases, some people just run:

        git-dch

While others tend to do:

        git-dch -S -a # even several times followed by:
        git-dch -R -a

Having a UNRELEASED line only makes kind of sense in the first case.
But the longer I think about it, let's just drop it there either and
apply your patch as is. We can modify/revert later, should there be
complaints.
Thanks,
 -- Guido



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to