On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:38:15AM -0400, Luis Mondesi wrote:
> Ummm...
>
> What happens when users install their own custom themes and modify
> Splashy to use this new theme, then they install a new version of
> Splashy? Will their changes to config.xml be kept?
It should, I guess, yeah. But se
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:22 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:20:45AM -0400, Luis Mondesi wrote:
> > Good, this uswsusp is already fixed in Git:
>
> This bug is not related to uswsusp, please keep stuff where it belongs.
> >
> > I'll do a quick bug-fix release once I fi
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:21 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> >
> > Now, about splashy_config breaking when /etc/splashy/config.xml does not
> > exist, this is the right thing to do because without that
> > file /sbin/splashy won't work anyway. Why would somebody remove this
> > file from /etc/spl
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:20:45AM -0400, Luis Mondesi wrote:
> Good, this uswsusp is already fixed in Git:
This bug is not related to uswsusp, please keep stuff where it belongs.
>
> I'll do a quick bug-fix release once I fix the other RC
>
Anyway I failed to reproduce the uswsusp stuff, so the
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:07:13AM -0400, Luis Mondesi wrote:
> Umm
>
> There is an RC bug open for Splashy that's really related to uswsusp.
> Tim (maintainer of uswsusp and member of the Splashy theme) is working
> to fix this issue. I'll follow up with him on this.
Well, I closed the RC bu
Good, this uswsusp is already fixed in Git:
http://git.debian.org/?p=splashy/splashy.git;a=commit;h=a8b8ed0570330446c6404907608112110343ed24
I'll do a quick bug-fix release once I fix the other RC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 22:56 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:52:32AM +0100, Daniel Campos wrote:
> > I see... messy problem :-), ok let's wait until splashy situation is
> > stabilized. Thanks for you quick answer!
>
> I'm not sure the splashy situation will stabilize.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 05:21:03PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Basically, I really don't know how etch -> lenny upgrades will behave.
>
> The 'splashy' package doesn't exist in etch; so if this is an issue only on
> upgrade, it should probably be downgraded.
Hmh, yeah, good point there. But
> Basically, I really don't know how etch -> lenny upgrades will behave.
The 'splashy' package doesn't exist in etch; so if this is an issue only on
upgrade, it should probably be downgraded.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
I see... messy problem :-), ok let's wait until splashy situation is
stabilized. Thanks for you quick answer!
Regards,
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:52:32AM +0100, Daniel Campos wrote:
> I see... messy problem :-), ok let's wait until splashy situation is
> stabilized. Thanks for you quick answer!
I'm not sure the splashy situation will stabilize. They seem to be happy
with the current situation, and there was 2 RC b
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 08:43:35PM +0100, Daniel Campos wrote:
> If Splashy package is installed but /etc/splashy/config.xml doesn't exist,
> package installation fails at postinstallation time. The "debian/postinst"
> file
> of desktop-base package contains the following code:
>
> if [ -x /sbin/
Package: desktop-base
Version: 5.0.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
If Splashy package is installed but /etc/splashy/config.xml doesn't exist,
package installation fails at postinstallation time. The "debian/postinst" file
of desktop-base package contains the following cod
13 matches
Mail list logo
