On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 22:56 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:52:32AM +0100, Daniel Campos wrote: > > I see... messy problem :-), ok let's wait until splashy situation is > > stabilized. Thanks for you quick answer! > > I'm not sure the splashy situation will stabilize. They seem to be happy > with the current situation, and there was 2 RC bugs waiting for them > without action. I've closed one and uploaded a fix for the other in > DELAYED/2, but I'm not sure they are that reactive and/or able to fix > that. > > Basically, I really don't know how etch -> lenny upgrades will behave. > > Cheers, > -- > Yves-Alexis > > > >
Umm.... There is an RC bug open for Splashy that's really related to uswsusp. Tim (maintainer of uswsusp and member of the Splashy theme) is working to fix this issue. I'll follow up with him on this. I saw your NMU about the other bug. Let me try to straight that out today and ask the debian maintainers to upload a fix. Now, about splashy_config breaking when /etc/splashy/config.xml does not exist, this is the right thing to do because without that file /sbin/splashy won't work anyway. Why would somebody remove this file from /etc/splashy? Let's see what we can do about this one. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
