Bug#500416: upgrading clamav-base but not clamav-daemon breaks latter

2008-09-28 Thread Karl Chen
> On 2008-09-28 09:10 PDT, Stephen Gran writes: >> Good point. What about an version-equals dependency from >> clamav-daemon to clamav-base? Stephen> I think this used to be the case, but was changed Stephen> relatively recently to make it possible to binNMU Stephen> clama

Bug#500416: upgrading clamav-base but not clamav-daemon breaks latter

2008-09-28 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Karl Chen said: > > On 2008-09-28 02:13 PDT, Stephen Gran writes: > > Stephen> This one time, at band camp, Karl Chen said: > >> Package: clamav-base Version: 0.94.dfsg-1 Severity: normal > >> > >> > >> I ran an "apt-get upgrade" (as opposed t

Bug#500416: upgrading clamav-base but not clamav-daemon breaks latter

2008-09-28 Thread Karl Chen
> On 2008-09-28 02:13 PDT, Stephen Gran writes: Stephen> This one time, at band camp, Karl Chen said: >> Package: clamav-base Version: 0.94.dfsg-1 Severity: normal >> >> >> I ran an "apt-get upgrade" (as opposed to "apt-get >> dist-upgrade"); this upgraded clamav-base

Bug#500416: upgrading clamav-base but not clamav-daemon breaks latter

2008-09-28 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Karl Chen said: > Package: clamav-base > Version: 0.94.dfsg-1 > Severity: normal > > > I ran an "apt-get upgrade" (as opposed to "apt-get > dist-upgrade"); this upgraded clamav-base but not > clamav-daemon. This introduced the config item > ScanPartialMessages which

Bug#500416: upgrading clamav-base but not clamav-daemon breaks latter

2008-09-27 Thread Karl Chen
Package: clamav-base Version: 0.94.dfsg-1 Severity: normal I ran an "apt-get upgrade" (as opposed to "apt-get dist-upgrade"); this upgraded clamav-base but not clamav-daemon. This introduced the config item ScanPartialMessages which older clamav-daemon doesn't understand. I think a versioned de