Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I don't think I'm misinterpreting it and I'm more than happy with how
your patch works - I just want a version that does more ;-)
To each their own. :-)
As a frequent user of --diff, it was one of the first things I tried
whilst testing your patch and I'd like to get th
Hi,
Eric Gerlach wrote:
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
I've got a local copy of debcommit with a slightly revised patch
(using exit status rather than attempting to parse the output) that
works great for commits and "debcommit --diff $file" but haven't
found a method that works properly for "deb
Hi Adam,
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 19:39 -0400, Eric Gerlach wrote:
Admission: That second patch was horribly broken.
I've attached a third patch, this one actually works on git repositories
*with* commits too.
Just a quick note to let you know that we're not ignor
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 19:39 -0400, Eric Gerlach wrote:
> Admission: That second patch was horribly broken.
>
> I've attached a third patch, this one actually works on git repositories
> *with* commits too.
Just a quick note to let you know that we're not ignoring your
patch. :-)
I've got
Admission: That second patch was horribly broken.
I've attached a third patch, this one actually works on git repositories
*with* commits too.
--
Eric Gerlach, Network Administrator
Federation of Students
University of Waterloo
p: (519) 888-4567 x36329
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- /usr/bin/debcom
5 matches
Mail list logo
