Bug#497085: allow making no timeout

2010-06-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 05:01:29AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > FZ> If people want to have a timeout of 0 then they just can set it > FZ> at /etc/default/grub > > But no timeout is different that a timeout of 0, isn't it? > Does timeout=0 almost the same as timeout=999... or timeout=0.0

Bug#497085: allow making no timeout

2008-08-29 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Samstag, den 30.08.2008, 05:01 +0800 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > FZ> please send patches upstream to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as I already told you. > I thought I was changing a the Debian part, not the upstream part. Then look at the source package, everything in /debian/ is debian everything else i

Bug#497085: allow making no timeout

2008-08-29 Thread jidanni
FZ> please send patches upstream to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as I already told you. I thought I was changing a the Debian part, not the upstream part. FZ> If people want to have a timeout of 0 then they just can set it FZ> at /etc/default/grub But no timeout is different that a timeout of 0, isn't it? Doe

Bug#497085: allow making no timeout

2008-08-29 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Samstag, den 30.08.2008, 03:20 +0800 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > The following patches enable the user to avoid creating any timeout > line in grub.cfg, without her/him needing to edit more than > /etc/default/grub. Please use `diff -u' format, i.e. unified instead of context. and please send

Bug#497085: allow making no timeout

2008-08-29 Thread jidanni
Package: grub-pc Version: 1.96+20080724-8 Severity: wishlist File: /etc/default/grub Tags: patch The following patches enable the user to avoid creating any timeout line in grub.cfg, without her/him needing to edit more than /etc/default/grub. *** /etc/grub.d/00_header 2008-08-18 22:44:45.0