* Adeodato Simó [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:04:40 +0100]:
> * Daniel Burrows [Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:16:53 -0700]:
> > That's really weird. It doesn't have a reason for marking digikam:
> > it looks like it's treating it as part of the root set. But why?
> > digikam is specifically called out at the to
Daniel Burrows a scris:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:39:58AM +0300, Eddy Petrișor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
Daniel Burrows a scris:
Can you reproduce the same behavior at the command-line? If so, I'd
yes
appreciate a typescript / dump of the output of that command with the
opti
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:39:58AM +0300, Eddy Petrișor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Daniel Burrows a scris:
>> Can you reproduce the same behavior at the command-line? If so, I'd
>
> yes
>
>> appreciate a typescript / dump of the output of that command with the
>> options "-o 'Debug
Can you reproduce the same behavior at the command-line? If so, I'd
appreciate a typescript / dump of the output of that command with the
options "-o 'Debug::pkgAutoRemove=true'" on the command-line.
If not, please run aptitude-create-state-bundle and place its output
somewhere that I can dow
4 matches
Mail list logo
