* Adeodato Simó [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:04:40 +0100]:

> * Daniel Burrows [Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:16:53 -0700]:

> >   That's really weird.  It doesn't have a reason for marking digikam:
> > it looks like it's treating it as part of the root set.  But why?
> > digikam is specifically called out at the top of the trace as being
> > automatically installed.

> >   I assume that you haven't set Aptitude::Keep-Unused-Pattern or
> > Apt::NeverAutoRemove to something that would include digikam, but
> > that's the only reason I can think of or see that this *should* be
> > happening.  (well, I suppose there's also the possibility that it's
> > somehow Essential, but I think we can discount that)

> I'm also suffering from this on a new install. You can guess it's very
> annoying...

In my attached typescript libsplashy1 wasn't removed when removing
uswusp. However I just installed okular (with aptitude instead of
apt-get, could that be relevant), and removing it indeed uninstalles its
automatic dependencies.

Cheers,

-- 
Adeodato Simó                                     dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer                                  adeodato at debian.org
 
                                  Listening to: Paolo Conte - Via con me




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to