* Adeodato Simó [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:04:40 +0100]: > * Daniel Burrows [Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:16:53 -0700]:
> > That's really weird. It doesn't have a reason for marking digikam: > > it looks like it's treating it as part of the root set. But why? > > digikam is specifically called out at the top of the trace as being > > automatically installed. > > I assume that you haven't set Aptitude::Keep-Unused-Pattern or > > Apt::NeverAutoRemove to something that would include digikam, but > > that's the only reason I can think of or see that this *should* be > > happening. (well, I suppose there's also the possibility that it's > > somehow Essential, but I think we can discount that) > I'm also suffering from this on a new install. You can guess it's very > annoying... In my attached typescript libsplashy1 wasn't removed when removing uswusp. However I just installed okular (with aptitude instead of apt-get, could that be relevant), and removing it indeed uninstalles its automatic dependencies. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listening to: Paolo Conte - Via con me -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]