On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This means that we should reassign the bug report from octave-ftp to the
> swig package. Do you agree? If yes, could you make a short suggestion on
> what should be changed in SWIG to fix the bug? I will then forwar
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Michael Goffioul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-13 10:41]:
>
>> This is a known problem. See the following thread
>> http://www.nabble.com/%22clear-all%22-problem-for-classes-defined-in-oct-files-%28Was%3A-%3A-bug%29-
This is a known problem. See the following thread
http://www.nabble.com/%22clear-all%22-problem-for-classes-defined-in-oct-files-%28Was%3A-%3A-bug%29-%28Concerns%3A-SWIG%29-td17473917.html#a17473917
Michael.
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Rafa
3 matches
Mail list logo