On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This means that we should reassign the bug report from octave-ftp to the > swig package. Do you agree? If yes, could you make a short suggestion on > what should be changed in SWIG to fix the bug? I will then forward this to > the swig maintainer.
The thread I referred already explains what the problem is. In summary, an oct-file that defines a new octave object class (octave_base_value inherited) should also make sure not to be unloaded before all objects of that class have been deleted. It should somehow lock itself to avoid unloading. Michael. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
