Le lundi, 5 mars 2012 21.39:51, Matt Taggart a écrit :
> Having the explicit dependencies on essential packages was still sort of
> useful to demonstrate what packages provided the LSB components. Also
> without them suppose an unlisted dependency becomes no longer essential
> then that will introd
Having the explicit dependencies on essential packages was still sort of
useful to demonstrate what packages provided the LSB components. Also
without them suppose an unlisted dependency becomes no longer essential
then that will introduce a bug in the LSB support.
Long ago there existed a docu
severity 488237 minor
# Policy 3.5 "should not", so more than wishlist
thanks
Followup-For: Bug #488237
As I reported one year ago:
> # Depends: sed, ncurses-bin
I left it at wishlist then since Lenny was just beginning to go into
freeze, but depending on Essential packages is prohibited by Poli
Package: lsb-base
Version: 3.2-12
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
In the control file:
# Package: lsb-base
[...]
# Depends: sed, ncurses-bin
# Replaces: lsb-core (<< 2.0-6), lsb (<< 2.0-6)
# Conflicts: lsb-core (<< 2.0-6), lsb (<< 2.0-6)
"Depends: sed, ncurses-bin" achieves nothing, since both pa
4 matches
Mail list logo
