On Tuesday 24 June 2008 13:40:32 you wrote:
> And if that's the case, it's not at all a dpkg problem but a
> user-configuration problem...
>
I removed libnss-ldap and libpam-ldap packages and dpkg started much faster.
Thank you.
I suppose, this issue can be closed.
--
Best Regards,
Oleg
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Oleg Atamanenko wrote:
> connect(11, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(389),
> sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 16) = -1 EINPROGRESS (Operation now in
> progress)
>
Please try to remove libnss-ldap
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Oleg Atamanenko wrote:
> > Do you have the problem with other packages as well ?
>
> With any package. I suppose it is the problem with dpkg itself.
Weird. Did you try to "strace" dpkg to see what makes him so busy ?
"strace -p " to trace an already running process.
Did you c
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Oleg Atamanenko wrote:
> Should I provide some extra information, etc?
Yes you should it's not clear what goes wrong on your machine and
nobody else had such a problem.
Can you provide a log of the upgrade session ?
What does /var/log/dpkg.log show from you long upgrade
On Monday 23 June 2008 21:19:13 you wrote:
> Well, I meant to reassign this to dpkg so that it would be in front of
> people who can actually help you, but it looks like I messed up (didn't
> actually Cc [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Let me try again.
>
> Daniel
Thank you!
Best Regards,
Oleg A
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 08:35:37PM +0700, Oleg Atamanenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Is there any progress on the issue?
> Should I provide some extra information, etc?
>
> Can you provide some information on how to find what is the cause of the
> issue?
Well, I meant to reassign
Is there any progress on the issue?
Should I provide some extra information, etc?
Can you provide some information on how to find what is the cause of the
issue?
Best Regards,
Oleg Atamanenko.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
7 matches
Mail list logo
