Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> while your (Jay's) analysis is essentially correct, we are seeing problems
> on s390 of which I do not have the impression that they would be going
> away on their own (e.g. libsaml5 is marked failed in the buildd db but
> does not have a log):
>
> **
Hi,
while your (Jay's) analysis is essentially correct, we are seeing
problems on s390 of which I do not have the impression that they would
be going away on their own (e.g. libsaml5 is marked failed in the buildd
db but does not have a log):
** libsaml5 has an unsatisfied dependency on s390
2 matches
Mail list logo
