On Sat, 03 May 2008 16:43:44 +0200
Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And I can perfectly reproduce it here, debug output from epson2 shows
> this:
>
> May 3 16:18:39 thumper saned[23647]: [epson2] attach: devname =
> autodiscovery, type = 4
> May 3 16:18:39 thumper saned[23647]: [
Giuseppe Sacco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> I did a few more tests. I am not able to reproduce the problem if I call
> saned from the command line. The problem only arise when I use it via
> inetd.
Very indicative of the problem already :>
> If, as it was suggested, I comment out the line "
Hi Julien,
I did a few more tests. I am not able to reproduce the problem if I call
saned from the command line. The problem only arise when I use it via
inetd.
Running it via inetd with SANE_DEBUG_DLL=255 I get (in syslog)
http://eppesuigoccas.homedns.org/~giuseppe/debian/saned.log
I cannot see
"Giuseppe Sacco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> this is a log on the same machine without any scanner connected:
> [sanei_wire] sanei_w_array: DECODE: maximum amount of allocated memory
> exceeded (limit: 1048576, new allocation: 3145728, total: 4194304 bytes)
> [net] sane_get_devices: ignorin
Hi Julien,
this is a log on the same machine without any scanner connected:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ env SANE_DEBUG_NET=255 scanimage -L
[sanei_debug] Setting debug level of net to 255.
[net] sane_init: authorize = 0x804ae30, version_code = 0xbfb775f8
[net] sane_init: SANE net backend version 1.0.14 (
Giuseppe Sacco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> I am testing it on an i386 machine. The tcpdump file is attached. About
> the test device: how do I do it? I tried this way:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ scanimage -d net:localhost:test
> but notice that this is not calling the SANE_LIST_DEVICES (or th
Hi Julien,
I am testing it on an i386 machine. The tcpdump file is attached. About
the test device: how do I do it? I tried this way:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ scanimage -d net:localhost:test
P5
# SANE data follows
157 196
255
but notice that this is not calling the SANE_LIST_DEVICES (or the way it
is
Giuseppe Sacco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
>> Which backend is used by saned on the server side? I know we've seen
>> some strange things with the epson backend in the past.
>
> I have the same behavior with two scanners:
> fujitsu fi-5110C (backend fujitsu)
> epson perfection 1670 photo (back
Hi Julien,
Il giorno ven, 02/05/2008 alle 16.25 +0200, Julien BLACHE ha scritto:
[...]
> So neither saned nor the net backend are at fault here.
>
> Which backend is used by saned on the server side? I know we've seen
> some strange things with the epson backend in the past.
I have the same beha
Giuseppe Sacco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> The latest version of saned doesn't work anymore. Whenever you connect
> to saned and try to get a list of available devices, saned will reply
> incorrectly, i.e., a wrong number as number of devices, and wrong values
> when downloading the devices
Package: sane-utils
Version: 1.0.19-5
Severity: important
The latest version of saned doesn't work anymore. Whenever you connect
to saned and try to get a list of available devices, saned will reply
incorrectly, i.e., a wrong number as number of devices, and wrong values
when downloading the devic
11 matches
Mail list logo
