Giuseppe Sacco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,
>> Which backend is used by saned on the server side? I know we've seen >> some strange things with the epson backend in the past. > > I have the same behavior with two scanners: > fujitsu fi-5110C (backend fujitsu) > epson perfection 1670 photo (backend snapscan) OK. Can you test with the test backend? If it works with the test backend, it's a backend bug. FWIW I have never seen such a bug here (and I've been doing quite some work on saned :). > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ scanimage -L > [sanei_wire] sanei_w_array: DECODE: maximum amount of allocated memory > exceeded (limit: 1048576, new allocation: 3145728, total: 4194304 bytes) > Segmentation fault > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ > > this happens because the list of devices is not just one or two, but > something like 638027 (a very large number). Interesting. Are you on i386 or amd64? Please do a network capture and send it my way, privately if needed. JB. -- Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian, because code matters more Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | <http://www.debian.org> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
