Hello,
Selon Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The old binaries from previous versions stay in unstable. So yes, you're
> wrong and they should be removed from unstable.
Thanks to you and to Thomas for correcting this mistake. I've retitled the RM
bugs.
Regards,
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 08:37:55PM +0200, Thomas Girard wrote:
> Le jeudi 01 mai 2008 à 20:10 +0200, Thomas Viehmann a écrit :
> > thanks for filing these, but I do think all of them should be *unstable*
> > removals. If you have more of them, could you file them without the
> > /testing,
> > pl
Hello Thomas,
Le jeudi 01 mai 2008 à 20:10 +0200, Thomas Viehmann a écrit :
> thanks for filing these, but I do think all of them should be *unstable*
> removals. If you have more of them, could you file them without the /testing,
> please? (And if you are bored, retitle the existing ones...)
I
Hi Thomas,
thanks for filing these, but I do think all of them should be *unstable*
removals. If you have more of them, could you file them without the /testing,
please? (And if you are bored, retitle the existing ones...)
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
Package: ftp.debian.org
Please remove the architecture dependent binaries built from
libxmlrpc3-java for the alpha and hppa architectures. They will not be
built anymore because default-jdk-builddep is not available on theses
arches.
Thanks
Regards,
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
5 matches
Mail list logo