On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 08:37:55PM +0200, Thomas Girard wrote: > Le jeudi 01 mai 2008 à 20:10 +0200, Thomas Viehmann a écrit : > > thanks for filing these, but I do think all of them should be *unstable* > > removals. If you have more of them, could you file them without the > > /testing, > > please? (And if you are bored, retitle the existing ones...) > > I think testing is the right suite. Recent uploads of these packages to > sid changed their build-dependency from java-gcj-compat-dev to the newly > available default-jdk-builddep, which does not exist on alpha, arm and > hppa. > > Hence to help these new uploads transition to testing[1], I'm asking for > arch-specific packages that are no longer buildable from source to be > removed from testing. Am I wrong?
The old binaries from previous versions stay in unstable. So yes, you're wrong and they should be removed from unstable. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
