Hi,
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 07:51:54PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Until linux-modules-extra-2.6 is updated, virtualbox-ose-modules-* does
> > not exist in archive thus policy is not met technically.
>
> technically, policy is wrong here. the paragraph you cited doesn't f
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Until linux-modules-extra-2.6 is updated, virtualbox-ose-modules-* does
> not exist in archive thus policy is not met technically.
technically, policy is wrong here. the paragraph you cited doesn't fit
for kernel-module depends anyway and should be
updated/replaced/$whatever to
reopen 475738
block 475738 by 475131
thanks
Hi,
Funny. I think you are missing important points. I think
closing this bug was premature since we did not check facts.
(Of course, I did not explain my suituation well...)
I am on amd64 system. (As you have seen at the bottom of report.)
On Sat
Package: virtualbox-ose
Version: 1.5.6-dfsg-6
Severity: important
I do not see virtualbox-ose-modules in the archive.
While in the policy:
2.2.1 The main category
Every package in main must comply with the DFSG (Debian Free Software
Guidelines).
In addition, the packages in main
* must not
4 matches
Mail list logo
