On 08/02/2008, Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 23:40 -0500, James Vega wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 06:44:06PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > On 07/02/2008, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > That is a false alarm, the line in question does
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 18:44 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On 07/02/2008, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > That is a false alarm, the line in question does not use $(< foo), but
> > $(< foo command), which is a valid construct and works at least in
> > dash and bash.
[...]
As Jame
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 23:40 -0500, James Vega wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 06:44:06PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > On 07/02/2008, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > That is a false alarm, the line in question does not use $(< foo), but
> > > $(< foo command), which is a valid con
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 06:44:06PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On 07/02/2008, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That is a false alarm, the line in question does not use $(< foo), but
> > $(< foo command), which is a valid construct and works at least in
> > dash and bash.
> >
> > May I
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.10.15
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: checkbashisms
Hello Marc and devscripts maintainers,
On 07/02/2008, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:22:11PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > While performing an archive wide checkbashisms (
Package: aide-common
Severity: important
Version: 0.13.1-8
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: goal-dash
Hello maintainer,
While performing an archive wide checkbashisms (from the 'devscripts' package)
check I've found your package containing a /bin/sh script making
use of a bashism.
checkbashis
6 matches
Mail list logo
