On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 06:44:06PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > On 07/02/2008, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That is a false alarm, the line in question does not use $(< foo), but > > $(< foo command), which is a valid construct and works at least in > > dash and bash. > > > > May I suggest not using the latest and greatest checkbashisms script > > for mass bug filing until the script has shown to be reasonably bug > > free? > > Thanks for pointing that out, hopefully someone will fix checkbashisms.
This was actually fixed in devscripts' SVN earlier today. James -- GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
