"Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's what I've changed checkbashsims to use. Unless I'm missing
> something (which I'm more than happy to have pointed out :) "echo echo
> -e" matches "\s+echo\s+-e" as the expression isn't (in that case)
> anchored to the start of the line.
Oh, d
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 16:06 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The first two certainly should be prefixed by something to avoid them
> > matching strings that happen to end in "echo -e". I've updated
> > checkbashisms to do so for all three.
> >
> > As
"Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The first two certainly should be prefixed by something to avoid them
> matching strings that happen to end in "echo -e". I've updated
> checkbashisms to do so for all three.
>
> As far as I can see that won't stop "echo echo -e" matching, however.
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 14:50 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > As discussed recently, please find attached a patch (against lintian and
> > devscripts SVN) to checks/scripts that adds the bashism tests that
> > devscripts's checkbashisms performs but l
"Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As discussed recently, please find attached a patch (against lintian and
> devscripts SVN) to checks/scripts that adds the bashism tests that
> devscripts's checkbashisms performs but lintian does not.
Thank you! You beat me to doing the merger. O
Package: lintian
Version: 1.2.42
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
As discussed recently, please find attached a patch (against lintian and
devscripts SVN) to checks/scripts that adds the bashism tests that
devscripts's checkbashisms performs but lintian does not.
The only test I'v
6 matches
Mail list logo
