On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 02:43:50PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 10:24:28AM +0100, Xavier Lüthi wrote:
> > As apt-proxy do not have anymore any active developper but only some
> > package maintainers, and taking into account the number of bugs filed
> > for apt-proxy, I
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 10:24:28AM +0100, Xavier Lüthi wrote:
> "Francesco P. Lovergine" a écrit :
> > severity 460338 grave
> I agree to raise the severity of this bug as it renders the package
> unusable.
> In the past month, I've tried to have apt-proxy's package in a better
> shape, but the n
Hi,
Le Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:43:31 +0100,
"Francesco P. Lovergine" a écrit :
> severity 460338 grave
> thanks
>
I agree to raise the severity of this bug as it renders the package
unusable.
> I finally removed today apt-proxy in my work LAN because this hanging
> onto update is a too common p
severity 460338 grave
thanks
I finally removed today apt-proxy in my work LAN because this hanging
onto update is a too common pattern and renders the package unusable
since lenny release.
I found apt-cacher-ng much more usable, and I'm inclined in proposing
removal of the package if none had
4 matches
Mail list logo