On 30/01/08 21:26 +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> I've done some quick tests (I don't really use the pfstools octave bindings
> myself) and stumbled across the following error message:
>
> error: built-in function cannot be indexed with {
> error: evaluating assignment expression near line 36,
tags 458131 + help
thanks
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 11:40:54PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 29.12.2007, 18:58 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Harl:
> > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 10:30:27PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > > Octave 2.1 is deprecated (both by upstream and in Debian). P
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 11:40:54PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 29.12.2007, 18:58 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Harl:
> > I've received the following bug report for the pfstools Debian package. As
> > I'm
> > not into octave, it would be nice if you could have a look at it and tell
Am Samstag, den 29.12.2007, 18:58 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Harl:
> Hi,
>
> I've received the following bug report for the pfstools Debian package. As I'm
> not into octave, it would be nice if you could have a look at it and tell me
> your plans.
>
> (FTBFS = fails to build from source)
>
> On Fr
Hi,
I've received the following bug report for the pfstools Debian package. As I'm
not into octave, it would be nice if you could have a look at it and tell me
your plans.
(FTBFS = fails to build from source)
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 10:30:27PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> Octave 2.1 is deprecate
Package: octave-pfstools
Severity: normal
Hi,
Octave 2.1 is deprecated (both by upstream and in Debian). Please switch to 3.0,
provided by octave3.0.
I'm aware that this is not easy, as pfstools FTBFS with 3.0. Upstream is
aware of this already from the 2.9 series[1,2], but as this was a develop
6 matches
Mail list logo
