Hi, On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 11:40:54PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote: > Am Samstag, den 29.12.2007, 18:58 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Harl: > > I've received the following bug report for the pfstools Debian package. As > > I'm > > not into octave, it would be nice if you could have a look at it and tell me > > your plans. > > > > (FTBFS = fails to build from source) > > > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 10:30:27PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote: > > > Octave 2.1 is deprecated (both by upstream and in Debian). Please switch > > > to > > > 3.0, provided by octave3.0. > > > > > > I'm aware that this is not easy, as pfstools FTBFS with 3.0. Upstream is > > > aware of this already from the 2.9 series[1,2], but as this was a > > > development series, they didn't deem it important. Octave 3.0 is now the > > > new > > > stable series, so they should switch to it. > > > > > > [1] > > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1708631&group_id=129921&atid=716245 > > > > > > [2] > > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1478655&group_id=129921&atid=716245 > > > > (For a full log of the bug report, please see [3].) > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Sebastian > > > > PS: If you reply to this message, please Cc the reply to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - thanks. > > > > [3] http://bugs.debian.org/458131 > > Patches attached. > pfstools_debian.diff is for Debian, pfstools_upstream should be applied > to pfstools sources directly. The relevant discussion on Octave's help > list: > > http://www.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/help-octave/2007-December/007346.html > > I did only a cursory test (I know nothing about pfstools), so please > check.
Thanks a lot - I will have a look at it shortly. Cheers, Sebastian -- Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/ Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
