Al,
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 05:39:30PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
>> The bug is open for almost 100 days, it's a release goal and has been
>> advertised as such for months, and is under the 0day NMU policy, and
>> there is an ongoing BSP against g++-4.3 FTBFS going on.
>>
>> There is a patch avail
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 09:55:18PM +, Al Stone wrote:
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my libcoyotl 3.1.0-4.1 NMU.
It sure would have been nice if someone had at least *attempted*
to contact me before this NMU. There is actually a reason for
not h
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 09:55:18PM +, Al Stone wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> >Hi,
> >Attached is the diff for my libcoyotl 3.1.0-4.1 NMU.
>
> It sure would have been nice if someone had at least *attempted*
> to contact me before this NMU. There is actually a reason for
> not having uploa
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my libcoyotl 3.1.0-4.1 NMU.
It sure would have been nice if someone had at least *attempted*
to contact me before this NMU. There is actually a reason for
not having uploaded this package with a change similar to the one
given.
I now have
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my libcoyotl 3.1.0-4.1 NMU.
diff -u libcoyotl-3.1.0/debian/changelog libcoyotl-3.1.0/debian/changelog
--- libcoyotl-3.1.0/debian/changelog
+++ libcoyotl-3.1.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+libcoyotl (3.1.0-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+
5 matches
Mail list logo
