Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 09:55:18PM +0000, Al Stone wrote:
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my libcoyotl 3.1.0-4.1 NMU.
It sure would have been nice if someone had at least *attempted*
to contact me before this NMU. There is actually a reason for
not having uploaded this package with a change similar to the one
given.
I now have to spend more time than I had planned on to get in a
proper fix.
A little common courtesy -- something that appears to be sorely
lacking in Debian lately -- could have gone a long way.
The bug is open for almost 100 days, it's a release goal and has been
advertised as such for months, and is under the 0day NMU policy, and
there is an ongoing BSP against g++-4.3 FTBFS going on.
There is a patch available, and you didn't react on the bug. I don't
touch bugs where I saw a maintainer activity in the first place.
Cheers,
QED. There is no need to insult my intelligence, or my efforts
on Debian. There is an assumption here that I am completely unaware
of what's going on with my bugs, the project, and that I have no desire
to fix my bugs.
An assumption has also been made that because I did not make some
sort of announcement in the bug report, that nothing was going on.
None of these assumptions are true. What I was trying to point out
was that if one had simply asked, they would have found that out.
--
Ciao,
al
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Al Stone Alter Ego:
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian Developer
-or- http://www.debian.org
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
