David Prévot wrote:
> I wonder if the initial order has an implied meaning (aka “if you're not
> sure, use the first one; if you feel like it doesn't fit your need, look
> at the second one, etc.”), and in case we should respect this order
> (keep the default address in the first position), I edite
Le 15/12/2011 17:47, Justin B Rye a écrit :
> David Prévot wrote:
>> Ok, I agree that a list could make the purpose clearer
>> […] and ask Don if it's OK to commit the
>> attached patch. You can see the online result on my test server:
>>
>> http://www.tilapin.org/debian/Bugs/Developer.en#fol
David Prévot wrote:
> Ok, I agree that a list could make the purpose clearer. I anyway adapted
> a bit your proposal (thus CCing debian-l10n-english@l.d.o because I
> don't trust my en_MQ enough), and ask Don if it's OK to commit the
> attached patch. You can see the online result on my test server
Hi Bas,
Thanks for your proposal, and sorry for the long delay,
Le Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:40:57 +0100, Bas Wijnen a écrit :
> On http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer, under "Followup messages",
> there is some confusing text about several bug addresses. I think
> things would be more clear with a
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
On http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer, under "Followup messages",
there is some confusing text about several bug addresses. I think
things would be more clear with a list of addresses and what they do:
-
5 matches
Mail list logo
