Bug#452599: moinmoin 1.8: using systemwide copy of fckeditor.

2009-02-25 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 01:08:03AM +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: >On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 11:25 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 08:50:51AM +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: >> >> I haven't tested it that much yet, but it seems to work

Bug#452599: moinmoin 1.8: using systemwide copy of fckeditor.

2009-02-25 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 11:25 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 08:50:51AM +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > >> I haven't tested it that much yet, but it seems to work. Also, I > >> haven't tested unstable's fckeditor_1:2.6.4-1 either. > > > >For reference, upstream have/had some

Bug#452599: moinmoin 1.8: using systemwide copy of fckeditor.

2009-02-25 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 08:50:51AM +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: >Some clarification for the readers who didn't follow the whole story... Good! >On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 07:48 +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: >> That was quite easy actually. Sounds great!

Bug#452599: moinmoin 1.8: using systemwide copy of fckeditor.

2009-02-24 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
Hi, Some clarification for the readers who didn't follow the whole story... On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 07:48 +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > That was quite easy actually. Previously, the problem is that moinmoin used fckeditor 2.2, and the fckeditor package was shipping 2.6. Since moinmoin has some p

Bug#452599: moinmoin 1.8: using systemwide copy of fckeditor.

2009-02-24 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
Hi, I've had a try enabling fckeditor in moinmoin 1.8. That was quite easy actually. I've attached a temporary patch. I haven't tested it that much yet, but it seems to work. Also, I haven't tested unstable's fckeditor_1:2.6.4-1 either. I have some concerns with the lack of control we have over t