Unless things have changed, razor supports both sys-syslog (log via
Perl's syslog) and also syslog (log via a direct socket to a syslog
server.) When the direct syslog was first implemented it did not
work at all - I tried it and it created a file called 'syslog'! I
patched the debian ver
Justin Mason wrote:
> Francois Marier writes:
>> On 2007-10-31 at 10:28:26, Sven Hartge wrote:
>>> I don't think that changing the logcheck rules is a proper fix. If
>>> making razor log via syslog changes the way spamd represents itself,
>>> there must be somethin fishy going on which should be i
Francois Marier writes:
> Hi Sven,
>
> On 2007-10-31 at 10:28:26, Sven Hartge wrote:
> > I don't think that changing the logcheck rules is a proper fix. If
> > making razor log via syslog changes the way spamd represents itself,
> > there must be somethin fishy going on which should be investigat
Hi Sven,
On 2007-10-31 at 10:28:26, Sven Hartge wrote:
> I don't think that changing the logcheck rules is a proper fix. If
> making razor log via syslog changes the way spamd represents itself,
> there must be somethin fishy going on which should be investigated and
> not papered over.
You're ri
Francois Marier wrote:
> As far as the logcheck rules are concerned, the spamassassin rules could
> easily be added to the razor package to fix this problem.
I don't think that changing the logcheck rules is a proper fix. If
making razor log via syslog changes the way spamd represents itself,
the
Hi Sven,
As far as the logcheck rules are concerned, the spamassassin rules could
easily be added to the razor package to fix this problem.
I am a bit surprised to hear about problems with logging to syslog. Corrin
and I never had any problems with it, so we're quite curious to know what
kinds o
6 matches
Mail list logo
