Hi Sven, On 2007-10-31 at 10:28:26, Sven Hartge wrote: > I don't think that changing the logcheck rules is a proper fix. If > making razor log via syslog changes the way spamd represents itself, > there must be somethin fishy going on which should be investigated and > not papered over.
You're right, it would be good to get to the bottom of this. I would guess that it has to do with how SpamAssassin is calling razor. > Francois Marier wrote: > > I am a bit surprised to hear about problems with logging to syslog. Corrin > > and I never had any problems with it, so we're quite curious to know what > > kinds of problems you ran into. > > My memory is a bit "fuzzy" in this regard, but I remember some fallout > comming from the log-problem, notably in analysing tools like munin. That would make sense. If SpamAssassin's messages are displayed as another process' messages. Francois -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
