> Unfortunately, the menu item "installer components to
> load" does not show partconf or anything similar.
Actually, partconf-find-partitions is included on the CD. I also think
that it is loaded as "additional component". But probably, it is part
of partman, and hence not listed as a separate me
> You could maybe boot in expert mode and install the "partconf"
> optional package when prompted for extra Debian Installer components
> to install.
Sounds good.
Unfortunately, the menu item "installer components to
load" does not show partconf or anything similar.
Can i build my own installer i
> Please, can you post the whole output of fdisk -l? I bet you have a
> dualboot system with Windows but I'd like to check that.
It is a bit cumbersome to get the debian-installer here, so let me try
to explain in words what is going on:
/dev/hda1 is a windows FAT partition indeed (marked bootabl
Andreas Balser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Hmm, OK. That confirms that, as you suggested, partman (rather
>> libparted) cannot read your partition table...and there really is a
>> bug somewhere.
>
> :-O
>
> Does anyone know a way around this? Can I get an older installer
> somewhere, install an
Quoting Andreas Balser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Hmm, OK. That confirms that, as you suggested, partman (rather
> > libparted) cannot read your partition table...and there really is a
> > bug somewhere.
>
> :-O
>
> Does anyone know a way around this? Can I get an older installer
> somewhere, insta
> Hmm, OK. That confirms that, as you suggested, partman (rather
> libparted) cannot read your partition table...and there really is a
> bug somewhere.
:-O
Does anyone know a way around this? Can I get an older installer
somewhere, install an old version, and then dist-upgrade step-by-step?
Than
Quoting Andreas Balser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Hmmm, have you tried hitting Enter to select the drive that's
> > displayed?
> >
> > *That* should show you the partitions to display, IIRC.
>
> Not quite: He asks whether it is okay to generate a whole new
> partition table (but I can still undo tha
> Hmmm, have you tried hitting Enter to select the drive that's
> displayed?
>
> *That* should show you the partitions to display, IIRC.
Not quite: He asks whether it is okay to generate a whole new
partition table (but I can still undo that). If I agree, I see one
more line underneath the drive s
> Once more: When I enter into "manual" partition mode, I see one line
> corresponding to my harddrive only. This line shows the harddrive
> itself. It should display a list of partitions below this line, right?
Hmmm, have you tried hitting Enter to select the drive that's
displayed?
*That* sho
package: partman
severity: important
I am just trying to install debian to existing partitions of the
harddisk of my laptop.
However, the "manual" partitioning method only shows the whole
Harddisk, and wants to create a new partition-table for the whole
disk.
This is true with the netinst-, as we
10 matches
Mail list logo