On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 04:34:14PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> I'll have a look at grub2
> support as soon as I find the time.
Great. Please let us know when you do.
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want my phone call!
What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:35:01PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> This isn't 0.97-33 (it's in experimental).
Well, we can drop the grub-install.in part for now, the part in device.c
is the important stuff for d-i and since d-i currently doesn't call
grub-install but rather calls grub directly this
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 04:27:20PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 03:25:15PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Btw, now that I check, this patch won't apply against grub 0.97-33. The
> > convert() function has been reimplemented.
> Thanks for having a look, I've a
Hi Robert,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 03:25:15PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> Btw, now that I check, this patch won't apply against grub 0.97-33. The
> convert() function has been reimplemented.
Thanks for having a look, I've attached an updated version which.
-- Guido
>From ca0658f9df0cd8319c4476f
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 03:07:59PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 06:15:26PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> > Hi Robert,
> > first of all, I fully understand your point regarding grub legacy
> > maintenance. But let me explain a bit...
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 05:36:22
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:55:26PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi Otavio,
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 04:09:15PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > I'd like to ask you to take a look at grub2 first. If it proves to be
> > difficult to do, I can even push Robert to make an exception for this
> > patc
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 06:15:26PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> first of all, I fully understand your point regarding grub legacy
> maintenance. But let me explain a bit...
>
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 05:36:22PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Failing that, what you're essentially re
Hi Otavio,
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 04:09:15PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I'd like to ask you to take a look at grub2 first. If it proves to be
> difficult to do, I can even push Robert to make an exception for this
> patch (as we did for e2fsprogs change) however, from d-i POV, the most
> diff
Guido Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Sorry for that. Please understand we're volunteers and are usually too
>> busy, specially when it comes to requests for new features that were sent
>> to the wrong branch of GRUB.
> So am I and that's exactly why I'd like to have working grub legacy
>
Hi Robert,
first of all, I fully understand your point regarding grub legacy
maintenance. But let me explain a bit...
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 05:36:22PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> Failing that, what you're essentially requesting is that we take care of
> upstream maintainance for additional fun
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 01:51:39PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 11:39:05AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Unlike Parted 1.8, GRUB 2 is already in the archive, and already interacts
> > with the installer. OTOH, I think the sataraid hackery is completely in the
> > wrong p
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 11:39:05AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> Unlike Parted 1.8, GRUB 2 is already in the archive, and already interacts
> with the installer. OTOH, I think the sataraid hackery is completely in the
> wrong place (although I can understand why they did it); please don't use it
>
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:48:37PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi Otavio,
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 07:24:58PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Guido Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > While I see that the patch is rather trivial, I share same feeling of
> > Robert. Let me explain it a bit
Hi Otavio,
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 07:24:58PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Guido Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While I see that the patch is rather trivial, I share same feeling of
> Robert. Let me explain it a bit more...
I see Roberts point completeley and I imagine it to be a pita mov
Guido Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > but we need support in grub/grub-installer for things to actually work.
>>
>> Please get it fixed in GRUB 2 first; then we could consider backporting.
> Oh c'mon. The bug has been sitting around in the BTS for half a year now
> without a comment and
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:30:16PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> > > but we need support in grub/grub-installer for things to actually work.
> >
> > Please get it fixed in GRUB 2 first; then we could consider backporting.
> Oh c'mon. The bug has been sitting around in the BTS for half a year now
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 09:16:19PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 06:21:12PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> > Hi,
> > any comments on the multipath patch. It really is needed to get
> > multipath to work in d-i. Many of the needed things are in place now,
>
> What is multipat
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 06:21:12PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi,
> any comments on the multipath patch. It really is needed to get
> multipath to work in d-i. Many of the needed things are in place now,
What is multipath? The URL referenced in the wiki [1] that is supposed to
explain it retur
Hi,
any comments on the multipath patch. It really is needed to get
multipath to work in d-i. Many of the needed things are in place now,
but we need support in grub/grub-installer for things to actually work.
Cheers,
-- Guido
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
19 matches
Mail list logo
