Bug#441496: libnss-ldapd: configuration settings created by debconf are unsupported

2007-09-17 Thread Arthur de Jong
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 21:04 +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: > Arthur de Jong wrote: > > I cannot reproduce this with a clean 0.3 install. > > What do you mean by 'clean'? A fresh install with nothing installed or > an aptitude remove libnss-ldap && aptitude install libnss-ldapd > situation? I wil

Bug#441496: libnss-ldapd: configuration settings created by debconf are unsupported

2007-09-17 Thread Arthur de Jong
tags 441496 + unreproducible wontfix thanks On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 15:48 +0200, schoenfeld / in-medias-res wrote: > yes, of course. Please find the attached files. I cannot see how version 0.3 of nss-ldapd could produce these config files. The config is clearly based on the nss_ldap (/etc/libnss-l

Bug#441496: libnss-ldapd: configuration settings created by debconf are unsupported

2007-09-17 Thread Patrick Schoenfeld
Arthur de Jong wrote: > I cannot see how version 0.3 of nss-ldapd could produce these config > files. The config is clearly based on the nss_ldap > (/etc/libnss-ldap.conf) configfile. Versions before 0.3 did this by Hm. I cannot see this, too. > default. The only thing that could cause this, is i

Bug#441496: libnss-ldapd: configuration settings created by debconf are unsupported

2007-09-10 Thread schoenfeld / in-medias-res
Hi, Arthur de Jong schrieb: > Could you attach your /etc/nss-ldapd.conf file (including all the > problem statements)? Also, if you have an /etc/libnss-ldap.conf file on > your system, could you also include that? yes, of course. Please find the attached files. Regards, Patrick # libnss-ldap.co

Bug#441496: libnss-ldapd: configuration settings created by debconf are unsupported

2007-09-10 Thread Arthur de Jong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Could you attach your /etc/nss-ldapd.conf file (including all the problem statements)? Also, if you have an /etc/libnss-ldap.conf file on your system, could you also include that? - -- - -- arthur - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://people.debian.org/~

Bug#441496: libnss-ldapd: configuration settings created by debconf are unsupported

2007-09-10 Thread schoenfeld / in-medias-res
Arthur de Jong schrieb: > The options aren't supported in that format. The correct syntax is Yeah. > specified in the nss-ldapd.conf(5) manual page. It is basically: Shame on me. I haven't yet had a look at the man page. Anyways a bug report is appropriate, because of the debconf thing. Good luc

Bug#441496: libnss-ldapd: configuration settings created by debconf are unsupported

2007-09-10 Thread Arthur de Jong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, schoenfeld / in-medias-res wrote: I have never used the version prior 0.3 so it appears as if this issue still exists. The created configuration was created by the current 0.3 version, so if it should not do that, then this nee

Bug#441496: libnss-ldapd: configuration settings created by debconf are unsupported

2007-09-10 Thread schoenfeld / in-medias-res
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Arthur de Jong writes: > Previous versions (before 0.3) tried to use the existing nss_ldap > configuration file (/etc/libnss-ldap.conf) directly as a basis for a new > nss-ldapd configuration file (/etc/nss-ldapd.conf). I have never used the vers

Bug#441496: libnss-ldapd: configuration settings created by debconf are unsupported

2007-09-10 Thread Arthur de Jong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Previous versions (before 0.3) tried to use the existing nss_ldap configuration file (/etc/libnss-ldap.conf) directly as a basis for a new nss-ldapd configuration file (/etc/nss-ldapd.conf). With release 0.3 nss-ldapd now does full checking of th

Bug#441496: libnss-ldapd: configuration settings created by debconf are unsupported

2007-09-10 Thread Patrick Schoenfeld
Package: libnss-ldapd Version: 0.3 Severity: normal Hi, i really would like to test libnss-ldapd in our environment, but I am unable to do so, because all those nss_base_* entries in the configuration file (which are created by the maintainer scripts) are unusable. This renders the package unusab