tags 441496 + unreproducible wontfix thanks On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 15:48 +0200, schoenfeld / in-medias-res wrote: > yes, of course. Please find the attached files.
I cannot see how version 0.3 of nss-ldapd could produce these config files. The config is clearly based on the nss_ldap (/etc/libnss-ldap.conf) configfile. Versions before 0.3 did this by default. The only thing that could cause this, is if you had a version before 0.3 installed at some point in time (which left the old config around). I cannot reproduce this with a clean 0.3 install. Upgrades of previous versions will be supported up to a point. Currently the format of the config file may undergo some backwards incompatible changes in the coming releases. It is hard to write conversion scripts for all possible changes and keep the whole thing manageable. Upgrades of the basic config options that Debconf provides will be supported, but anything beyond that cannot be supported until the format stabilises a more. Having the 0.2 release use the old nss_ldap configfile was arguably a mistake but I think it's not worth adding too many hacks in coming releases for. -- -- arthur - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://people.debian.org/~adejong --
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part