Bug#440242: closed

2008-11-11 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Zefram wrote: >>> There's no indication here that it might remove requested packages. >> Requested? 'dist-upgrade' command takes no additional arguments, see >> synopsis. > > I meant "requested" in the sense that I had earlier (months earlier) > explicitly requested to install the package, becaus

Bug#440242: closed by "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (closing #440242)

2008-11-11 Thread Zefram
reopen 440242 thanks Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: >Zefram wrote: >> There's no indication here that it might remove requested packages. >Requested? 'dist-upgrade' command takes no additional arguments, see synopsis. I meant "requested" in the sense that I had earlier (months earlier) explicitly req

Bug#440242: closed by "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (closing #440242)

2008-11-11 Thread Zefram
reopen 440242 thanks Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: >'dist-upgrade' command may remove packages without installing any replacement, >it's nature of this command. If you don't want to remove any packages, you >should use 'upgrade' command. All above is documented. Where is this documented? The man pa