reopen 440242 thanks Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: >Zefram wrote: >> There's no indication here that it might remove requested packages. >Requested? 'dist-upgrade' command takes no additional arguments, see synopsis.
I meant "requested" in the sense that I had earlier (months earlier) explicitly requested to install the package, because I wanted to (directly) use the facilities it provides. As opposed to the package having been installed just to satisfy a dependency. I also fail to see how the removal of xlockmore qualifies as an "expense" of "upgrading the most important packages". It doesn't have any declared conflicts. Its removal was gratuitous. -zefram -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
