On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 05:31:33PM +0700, Sikon wrote:
> Having qca2 as a separate source package would make sense, I think, as they're
> completely API-incompatible.
qca2 was uploaded yesterday.
> However, the maintainer would have to resolve the problem of
> /usr/lib/libqca.so
> being present
Having qca2 as a separate source package would make sense, I think, as
they're completely API-incompatible.
However, the maintainer would have to resolve the problem of
/usr/lib/libqca.so being present in both qca-dev and libqca2-dev. Of course,
it would have been better if upstream renamed the li
2 matches
Mail list logo
