On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 05:31:33PM +0700, Sikon wrote: > Having qca2 as a separate source package would make sense, I think, as they're > completely API-incompatible.
qca2 was uploaded yesterday. > However, the maintainer would have to resolve the problem of > /usr/lib/libqca.so > being present in both qca-dev and libqca2-dev. Of course, it would have been > better if upstream renamed the library, but it's not like that's going to > happen... I don't think it's necessary to have both qca-dev and libqca2-dev installable at the same time. qca1 is provided for compatibility with existing software only - it's deprecated and unmaintained upstream. Jan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
