Brian J Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hey Russ,
> OK, so we tried upgrading the AFS kernels from Debian unstable on the
> original machine. Unfortunately, it didn't seem to improve our
> situation. I then decided to disable AFS, and now the machine is
> running just fine. So to further t
Another message that should have gone out Saturday evening, but did not
make it. Probably no longer relevant, but resending anyway.
Faheem.
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
Brian J Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
T
Brian J Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To be honest, the last time I checked the system was on Thursday
> evening. When was the last time you used the computer without a problem
> Haipeng? Also, are you looking for the output from /var/log/messages
> Russ?
Yeah, wherever the system is set
Russ Allbery wrote:
Haipeng Shen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This is the end of the output from "dmesg". It seems like having to do
with afs. This might be caused the expired tokens in afs.
I'd actually say the opposite -- there's nothing there that really touches
on AFS. I was somewhat hopi
Haipeng Shen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I do not know for sure it is AFS, but the timing of the problem
> (including its previous occurrence) seems to suggest that. The problem
> always happens about 2 days after I reboot the system.
Does that correspond to the expiration time of Kerberos tick
I do not know for sure it is AFS, but the timing of the problem
(including its previous occurrence) seems to suggest that. The problem
always happens about 2 days after I reboot the system.
Russ Allbery wrote:
Haipeng Shen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This is the end of the output from "dm
Haipeng Shen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is the end of the output from "dmesg". It seems like having to do
> with afs. This might be caused the expired tokens in afs.
I'd actually say the opposite -- there's nothing there that really touches
on AFS. I was somewhat hoping to see a kernel B
Russ Allbery wrote:
Brian J Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Haipeng Shen wrote:
No. before I tried "top", I tried "ls", which generates response right
away.
I'm experiencing the same issue, although I would say that I'm also
having problems with ls. I tried restarting the ntp client to
This is the end of the output from "dmesg". It seems like having to do
with afs. This might be caused the expired tokens in afs.
**
openafs: module license 'http://www.openafs.org/dl/license10.html'
taints kernel.
Found system call table at 0xc02834c0 (pattern scan)
Starting AFS cache
Brian J Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Haipeng Shen wrote:
>> No. before I tried "top", I tried "ls", which generates response right
>> away.
> I'm experiencing the same issue, although I would say that I'm also
> having problems with ls. I tried restarting the ntp client to see if
> the cl
Haipeng Shen wrote:
No. before I tried "top", I tried "ls", which generates response right
away.
I'm experiencing the same issue, although I would say that I'm also
having problems with ls. I tried restarting the ntp client to see if
the clock was slightly skewed (my previous inclination), b
No. before I tried "top", I tried "ls", which generates response right
away.
Note that I ssh into the machine. The connection itself takes longer
than normal to succeed.
Russ Allbery wrote:
Haipeng Shen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have been waiting for the problem to appear again. I r
Haipeng Shen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have been waiting for the problem to appear again. I rebooted the
> machine using the 2.6 kernel this Thursday, and just now found out that
> the problem appeared. I typed "top" about 20 minutes ago, and nothing
> has returned yet ...
Are all commands
Russ Allbery wrote:
Haipeng Shen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Here is the situation. I have both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels installed.
1. If I use 2.6 kernel, once I leave the machine on for a while, the
machine slows down considerably. It almost feels like all the processes
are on slow motion
Haipeng Shen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is the situation. I have both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels installed.
> 1. If I use 2.6 kernel, once I leave the machine on for a while, the
> machine slows down considerably. It almost feels like all the processes
> are on slow motion. A simple command like
Here is the situation. I have both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels installed.
1. If I use 2.6 kernel, once I leave the machine on for a while, the
machine slows down considerably. It almost feels like all the processes
are on slow motion. A simple command like "top" would take a really long
time to execut
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
Faheem Mitha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What is the recommended configuration? We've been having problems using
the Etch kernel (2.6.18) and the Etch openafs module.
That's the recommended configuration. What problems are you having?
I'll let Ha
Faheem Mitha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the recommended configuration? We've been having problems using
> the Etch kernel (2.6.18) and the Etch openafs module.
That's the recommended configuration. What problems are you having?
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
Faheem Mitha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Package: openafs-modules-source
Version: 1.4.2-6
Severity: normal
Hi,
I can't get the current version (1.4.2-6) of the openafs module to
compile with the installed 2.4.27 kernel (2.4.27-3-686). I tried th
Faheem Mitha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: openafs-modules-source
> Version: 1.4.2-6
> Severity: normal
> Hi,
> I can't get the current version (1.4.2-6) of the openafs module to
> compile with the installed 2.4.27 kernel (2.4.27-3-686). I tried the
> openafs module source in sarge (1.3
20 matches
Mail list logo