On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 02:34:33AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 17, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > At this point I'll defer to the actual bug submitter for more details, as
> > I'm just a third party observer.
> Are there any new arguments or should I close this bug?
Does
On Aug 17, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At this point I'll defer to the actual bug submitter for more details, as
> I'm just a third party observer.
Are there any new arguments or should I close this bug?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 02:16:57AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 17, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > In this case, you've got LDAP (over TLS) providing NSS information,
> > > > which
> > > > udev presumably needs in order to start. This is one of those very
> > > > low-
On Aug 17, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > In this case, you've got LDAP (over TLS) providing NSS information, which
> > > udev presumably needs in order to start. This is one of those very
> > > low-level
> > Actually udev does not, networking has not even been started yet.
> So
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 01:55:09AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 17, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In this case, you've got LDAP (over TLS) providing NSS information, which
> > udev presumably needs in order to start. This is one of those very low-level
> Actually udev does
On Aug 17, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In this case, you've got LDAP (over TLS) providing NSS information, which
> udev presumably needs in order to start. This is one of those very low-level
Actually udev does not, networking has not even been started yet.
--
ciao,
Marco
signa
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 01:36:09AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 17, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So from my reading of the bug report, there appeared to be a chicken-and-egg
> > bootstrapping problem, which would be resolved by udev creating /dev/random
> > (and/or /dev/u
On Aug 17, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So from my reading of the bug report, there appeared to be a chicken-and-egg
> bootstrapping problem, which would be resolved by udev creating /dev/random
> (and/or /dev/urandom).
Which I really do not want to do, because it opens the way to e
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 01:22:15AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 17, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Bug#412328: udev should create /dev/random in make_extra_nodes
> Why do you believe I should change my position about this?
So from my reading of the bug report,
On Aug 17, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bug#412328: udev should create /dev/random in make_extra_nodes
Why do you believe I should change my position about this?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
10 matches
Mail list logo
