On Aug 17, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So from my reading of the bug report, there appeared to be a chicken-and-egg > bootstrapping problem, which would be resolved by udev creating /dev/random > (and/or /dev/urandom). Which I really do not want to do, because it opens the way to every "special" (read: "retarded") application to request that its own device nodes are manually created to work around some misfeature. Can you make the case for this situation to be more special than others?
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
