On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:14:50PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
> Guido wrote:
> > I'm not sure I aggree here. While it's correct that git does great at
> > detecting renames on merges it wouldn't know about these on the upstream
> > branch itself, right?
>
> Wrong :). It *is* sufficient to record u
Guido wrote:
> I'm not sure I aggree here. While it's correct that git does great at
> detecting renames on merges it wouldn't know about these on the upstream
> branch itself, right?
Wrong :). It *is* sufficient to record upstream changes as add's and
rm's. When recording, git does not care any
Hi,
I'm not sure I aggree here. While it's correct that git does great at
detecting renames on merges it wouldn't know about these on the upstream
branch itself, right? The interactive dialog gives the user the chance
to keep this history - it might be nice to be able to skip this on the
commandlin
3 matches
Mail list logo
